Legal Opinion

Gainesville, Jefferson & Southern Railroad v. Wall

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 13, 1885PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Railroads. Negligence. Damages. Before Judge Estes. Hall Superior Court. February Term, 1885. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Blandford, Justice.

This case was a certiorari to grant a new trial because the verdict of a jury in a justice’s court was without evi*283dence to support it. It appears from the record that the plaintiff in error ran over a cow and killed her, belonging to defendant, and that the cow was worth as much as the jurv found by their verdict. The only witness who testified in behalf of the plaintiff in error was the engineer, and his testimony showed that the railroad company had used all ordinary and reasonable care and diligence, but the fireman, who is always on the engine with the engineer, did not…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. QuickMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Johnston v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway v. GraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  4. Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. SimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  5. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API