Legal Opinion
Chin v. Namvar
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 11, 2008No. B198986PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUBIN, J.
INTRODUCTION
Appellant Kyong T. Chin was injured in May 2005 when he fell off a ladder while performing painting services at an Ontario shopping center known as Hollywood 28 (the shopping center). Although Chin at one time had been a licensed painting contractor, his license had expired in 2000, and he was not licensed at the time of injury. In January 2006, Chin and his wife filed a complaint naming as respondents Hollywood 28, L.L.C. (the limited liability corporation that owned the shopping center); Parviz Nadjat-Haiem (a partner in a business entity that owned one-half of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Feduniak v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Air Couriers International v. Employment Development DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Torres v. ReardonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics, Inc. v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sanders Construction Co., Inc. v. CerdaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Jones v. Sorenson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Zoom Electric, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 595District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Jones v. SorensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Van Elk, Ltd. v. LB/L-DS Ventures Metropolitan II CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2014