Legal Opinion

Commerce Bank of St. Louis, N.A. v. Dooling

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1994No. 62705PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAHAN, Judge.

Defendant Margaret B. Dooling (“Borrower”) appeals the judgment entered against her in a court-tried case brought by Commerce Bank of St. Louis, N.A. (“Bank”) to recover a deficiency judgment, costs and attorney’s fees following repossession and sale of an automobile. The dispositive issue on appeal is whether Bank satisfied its burden of proof that it provided Borrower with reasonable notice of its sale of the automobile, which is a prerequisite to Bank’s right to recover a deficiency judgment after the sale pursuant to § 400.9-504(3) RSMo Cum Supp. 1993. We reverse.

In April,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. Mallicoat v. Volunteer Finance & Loan Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966
  4. Gateway Aviation, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. In the Matter of Earl L. Carter, D/B/A Highland Farms, Bankrupt. Wells Fargo Bank v. Earl L. Carter, D/B/A Highland Farms, Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Diamond Bank v. Carter (In Re Carter)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1996
  2. Kennedy v. FournieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Blanke v. HendricksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Cub Cadet Corp. v. Mopec, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. In Re BrownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API