Legal Opinion
DIVISION 1235, AMALGAMATED TRANS. U. v. Metropolitan
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided August 31, 1979No. 79-3275PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WISEMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Division 1235, Amalgamated Transit Union (hereinafter referred to as “Union”) filed its cause of action in this Court against the defendants, Metropolitan Transit Authority (hereinafter referred to as “MTA”); ATE Management and Service Company (ATE), and Transportation Management of Tennessee (TMT). In its complaint the Union sought to compel the defendants to proceed to binding arbitration of the disputed terms of a new collective bargaining agreement which the parties have failed to negotiate. The Union asked this Court to grant a declaratory…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Division 1235, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Division 1235, Amalgamated Transit Union, Afl-Cio v. Metropolitan Transit Authority, AteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Local 1235, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityTennessee Supreme Court · 1990