Legal Opinion

Charles F. Ryan & Son, Inc. v. Lancaster Homes, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1965PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan. Judge Van Voorhis dissents in part and votes to modify the order appealed from by requiring respondents in their advertising to make reference to Lancaster Homes, Inc., or to make some other suitable designation to distinguish their enterprise from that of plaintiffs which had been conducted under the name of “ Homes by Ryan” prior to respondents’ entry into the area, for the reasons stated by Newton, J., at Trial Term. Respondents cannot be precluded from using their own name…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Capasso v. CapassoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Gemveto Jewelry Co., Inc. v. Jeff Cooper Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  3. Vance Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. Widell & SonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. M. Fabrikant & Sons, Ltd. v. Fabrikant Fine Diamonds, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  5. Winship v. WinshipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API