Legal Opinion

United States v. Nez Perce Tribe of Indians

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 19, 1971No. Appeal No. 2-70; Ind. Cl. Comm. Docket No. 175-BPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaramore, Judge

This case comes before us on a second appeal, this time by defendant, from a decision of the Indian Claims Commission.1 The Commission found, after remand (which is discussed later), (1) that the average value of plaintiff’s (hereinafter referred to as the Tribe) land was $5.50 per acre; (2) that the difference between such value and what was actually paid ($2.97) was so gross as to be unconscionable; and (3) that, therefore, pursuant to clause (3) of 25 U.S.C. § 70a (1964)2 the Tribe is entitled to recover additional consideration in the principal amount of $1,387,911. The Commission also…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. United States v. Thayer-West Point Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Osage Nation of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  4. Peoria Tribe of Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. SNAKE OR PIUTE INDIANS, ETC. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Mescalero Apache TribeUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  2. Strong v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  3. Seminole Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  4. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  5. Sac & Fox Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API