Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Crabbe, Etc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1924No. 18243PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

This is an original action in this court. The relator seeks a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring the defendant, as attorney general of the state, to issue his voucher in favor of the relator for the sum of $1,500, which he asserts is the fair and reasonable value of services rendered by him as special counsel for the director of public welfare of the state, upon the designation and appointment of the attorney general.

The issue is made, and the questions for consideration are presented, by motion of the attorney general for judgment on the pleadings. Our determination of the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Thomas v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Thomas v. Ohio State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Duffy v. ArnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
  4. Doe v. KurianskyNew York Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State of Ohio v. ArnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API