Legal Opinion

Embee Advice Establishment v. Holtzmann, Wise & Shepard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered on or about May 7, 1992, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion to dismiss the fourth and fifth causes of action of the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

This is a motion addressed to the sufficiency of the pleadings. Modern pleading rules focus upon whether the pleader has a cause of action, not whether he has properly stated one, and in making that determination, accompanying affidavits may be referred to for the limited purpose of remedying any defects in the pleadings (Barrows v Rozansky, 111 AD2d 105,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Daukas v. Shearson, Hammill & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  2. Barrows v. RozanskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Earsing v. NelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Jennings-Purnell v. JenningsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Confidence Transporation Inc. v. BuckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Lippett v. Education AllianceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Jennings-Purnell v. JenningsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API