Legal Opinion

Klick v. Crosstown State Bank of Ham Lake, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 6, 1985No. C5-85-207PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

Respondent brought suit seeking declaratory judgment declaring a non-competition clause in his employment contract to be unenforceable. After a trial on the matter, the district court held that the clause was unreasonable and therefore invalid. The employer appeals, claiming the court was in error in holding the clause invalid and, in the alternative, that the court should have “blue penciled” the clause and enforced it to the extent that it was reasonable.

FACTS

In October of 1983 appellant, Crosstown State Bank, and respondent, Thomas W. Klick, entered into an employment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Davies & Davies Agency, Inc. v. DaviesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Menter Co. v. BrockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. Eutectic Welding Alloys Corporation v. WestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. Jim W. Miller Construction, Inc. v. SchaeferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Midwest Sign & Screen Printing Supply Co. v. Robert Dalpe & Laird Plastics, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
  2. Webb Publishing Co. v. FosshageCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Overholt Crop Insurance Service Co. v. BredesonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Dean Van Horn Consulting Associates, Inc. v. WoldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Satellite Industries, Inc. v. KeelingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API