Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Personal Restraint of Finstad

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 2013No. 86018-1Published

1DissentWiggins, J.

¶17 (dissenting) — The exceptional sentence imposed on Lowell Deray Finstad was not supported by factual findings or the defendant’s stipulation as required by the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (SRA), chapter 9.94A *512RCW, and by Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S. Ct. 2531, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403 (2004), and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S. Ct. 2348, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435 (2000). This error resulted in the imposition of 40 months of incarceration that the trial court was not authorized to impose. Because he shows that more than three years of his sentence suffers from statutory and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Oregon v. IceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API