Menefield v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtKeller, P.J.
PRICE, WOMACK, KEASLER, HERVEY, COCHRAN, and ALCALA, JJ., joined.
A laboratory report was admitted into evidence, but the analyst who conducted the test and prepared the report did not testify. We hold that the defendant’s trial counsel has not been shown to have performed deficiently in failing to object to the report on Confrontation Clause grounds when the record does not contain counsel’s reasons for failing to object and does not establish whether the analyst could or would have testified if an objection had been lodged.
I. BACKGROUND
Appellant was charged with possessing cocaine in an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Goodspeed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Rylander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by564 opinions
- Nava, Andres MaldonadoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Lydell Anton Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Johnny Melchor MacIas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2017
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Kerry Gittens v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2018
559 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.