Legal Opinion

Bell v. Howes

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided January 18, 2012No. Case No. 2:06-CV-15086Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO REVOKE BOND

ARTHUR J. TARNOW, District Judge.

The Court granted Arthur Bell a conditional writ of habeas corpus on December 28, 2010, 757 F.Supp.2d 720 (E.D.Mich. 2010) on two grounds: Bell’s rights under Brady v. Maryland were violated and Bell’s trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Approximately one month later, the Court granted Bell’s motion for release pending appeal, releasing him on an unsecured bond and with certain restrictions. Respondent has now filed a motion to revoke bond because Bell tested positive for marijuana five times between…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Smith v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Bell v. HowesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API