Legal Opinion

Murphy, H. v. Karnek, S.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 2017No. Murphy, H. v. Karnek, S. No. 438 WDA 2016PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

SOLANO, J.

Before the Court are consolidated cross-appeals filed by Appellants Steve Karnek and Karnek Family Partners, LP, and Ap-pellees Harold B. Murphy, Jr., William J. Murphy, and Sidney C. Kameke from the trial court’s February 29, 2016 order disposing of the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. 1 We affirm.

This matter arises out of an intra-family dispute regarding ownership of oil and gas underlying a parcel of land in Washington County that the parties have referred to as the “Scott Heirs’ Farm.” Determination of the ownership interests depends upon a series of deeds…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Houston EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Mariner Chestnut Partners, L.P. Ex Rel. Lamm v. LenfestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Ambrogi v. ReberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Brookbank v. Benedum-Trees Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. MacKall v. FleegleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Buttaccio v. American Premier Underwriters, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Russo, F. v. Polidoro, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Cavallo Mineral Partners v. EQT Production CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. Cavallo Mineral Partners v. EQT Production CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Sensenig, J. v. Greenleaf, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API