Legal Opinion

Plant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 20, 1976No. BB-300PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We here review a judgment and sentence by which appellant was adjudicated guilty upon his plea of nolo contendere, expressly reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress, and the imposition of a sentence of one year and one day. Our examination of the record reveals that there was sufficient evidence which was apparently believed by the trial judge to sustain his denial of appellant’s motion to suppress based upon the police officers’ testimony that appellant consented to the search giving rise to the evidence sought to be suppressed. However the State candidly agrees…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  2. Mena v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API