Legal Opinion
Barnsdall Refining Corp. v. Locker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 22, 1938No. 28309PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
On the 3rd day of May, 1936, Harold R. Locker, while in the employ of the petitioner, sustained an accidental injury while he was working in the boiler house of said company. The parties will be referred to as they appear herein, the Barnsdall Refining Company being the petitioner, and Harold R. Locker being the respondent, except where the designation as they appeared in the proceeding before the State Industrial Commission is used in the quotations from the record, in which event they appear as respondent, meaning the Barnsdall Refining Company and claimant, meaning Harold R. Locker.
The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cornhuskers Theatres, Inc. v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Forrester v. MarlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Wm. A. Smith Const. Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Hauschildt v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. GeurinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Foster Wheeler Corporation v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Jones v. Troup-Moore & Hall Drilling CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Manhattan Long Construction Co. v. BrutonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Berna v. Maloney-Crawford Tank Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- City of El Reno v. ShortSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.