Legal Opinion
Berry v. Cadence Industries Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 17, 1982No. Civ. A. 79-2935PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Rosann S. Berry, 1 has brought this action alleging in two counts violations by defendants of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), invoking jurisdiction under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e). Plaintiff alleges first that defendants, in violation of 29 U.S.C. §§ 1021, 1022, 1055, and 1061, failed to disclose to her husband, Robert Earl Berry, now deceased, his opportunity to select an early survivor annuity which, following Mr. Berry’s death, would have provided plaintiff with benefits under a pension plan of the defendants. Second,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Amalgamated Cotton Garment & Allied Industries Fund v. J.B.C. Co. of Madera, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Smith v. MirmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Jameson v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- L.D. Jameson v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Berry, Estate of v. Cadence Industries CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.