D.C. Andrews & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Ford, Judge:
Imported from England were certain Carter hydraulic infinitely variable speed gears covered by the above-enumerated protest, which the collector of customs classified as mechanisms, devices, or instruments, intended or suitable for regulating, indicating, or controlling the speed of arbors, drums, disks, or similar uses, in paragraph 368(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the trade agreement with Switzerland, 90 Treas. Dec. 174, T.D. 53832, and im*370posed duty thereon at the compound rate of $2.25 each and 35 per centum ad valorem.
It is plaintiff’s contention that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Bacharach Industrial Instrument Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- National Biscuit Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
- Buhler Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- Paillard Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
3Cited by1 opinion
- D. C. Andrews & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966