Paillard Products, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
LAWRENCE, Judge:
Certain so-called synchronization apparatus was classified by the collector oí customs as instruments suitable for controlling the speed of arbors, disks, or similar uses in paragraph 368(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 368(a)), as modified by the trade agreement with Switzerland, 90 Treas. Dec. 174, T.D. 53832, and duty was assessed thereon at the rate of $2.25 each and 35 per centum ad valorem.
It is the contention of plaintiff that said devices should properly have been classified as articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Bacharach Industrial Instrument Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- National Biscuit Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
- Buhler Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
3Cited by1 opinion
- D.C. Andrews & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965