Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Davis, Agent

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 31, 1924No. 11636PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Marion.

Action to recover of the United States Railroad Administration, in charge of the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad as terminal or delivering carrier, the value of 1 mule not delivered in a shipment of 20 mules and 5 horses shipped from East St. Louis, 111., to the plaintiff at Cheraw, S. C. The presiding Judge held that plaintiff was not entitled to recover the value of the mule and directed a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $7.06, an amount which defendant admitted to be due on account of certain charges for freight, feeding,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Gannon v. Laclede Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  3. Rothrock v. Cordz-Fisher Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  4. McLeod v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  5. Baker v. Western Union Tel. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vereen v. Liberty Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Johnson v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API