Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 26, 1950No. 16375Published
1Opinion of the Court
217 S.C. 190 (1950)
60 S.E.2d 226
JOHNSON
v.
ATLANTIC COAST LINE R. CO.
16375
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
June 26, 1950.
Messrs. Paulling & James, of Darlington, for Appellant.
Messrs. Samuel Want, Sam Rogol and LeRoy M. Want, all of Darlington, for respondent.
Messrs. Paulling & James, of Darlington, for Appellant, in Reply.
June 26, 1950.
OXNER, Justice.
This action was brought to recover the sum of $80.00, the value of two calves which respondent alleged were killed by the negligent operation of one of appellant's trains. Appellant entered a general denial except as to the formal allegations of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Ford v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.