Martinez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
DALLY, Commissioner.
Each appellant was convicted for the theft of personal property under the value of five dollars; the punishment for each, a fine of twenty-five dollars.
On original submission the causes were remanded, by a per curiam opinion, for proper sentences, because the record reflects that the sentence was imposed upon each appellant in absentia. The State urges that it was unnecessary to remand the cases because the offenses were punishable by a fine only. See Millman v. State, 487 S.W. 2d 750 (Tex.Cr.App. 1972).
We have re-examined the record…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Millman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Kitchen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Reynolds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Peterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Bogany v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
- Griggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Bogany v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.