Legal Opinion

Wiertzema v. United States

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided April 17, 1990No. Civ. A3-89-38PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEBB, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Vance Wiertzema, was assessed and paid additional federal income tax for the taxable year 1983, after receiving a statutory Notice of Deficiency. Plaintiff had filed a claim for refund which was denied April 28, 1987.

Both plaintiff and defendant have moved for summary judgment in this case.

Facts

The parties have stipulated to certain facts. The pertinent facts are set forth. The plaintiff works on the family farm with his father and brothers. In February 1983 Plaintiff enrolled in a welding course at the Tulsa Welding School. Prior to this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Donnell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  2. Harold S. Divine and Rita K. Divine v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. Diaz v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amici v. United States (In re Amici)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
  2. RHOADES, McKEE, AND BOER v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1994
  3. Connell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API