Legal Opinion
RHOADES, McKEE, AND BOER v. United States
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided January 7, 1994No. 1:91:CV:540PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, District Judge.
After a bench trial in this Court, judgment was entered in favor of plaintiffs in the above-captioned matter on May 24, 1993. As a result, plaintiffs recovered taxes and penalties claimed against plaintiff Dale Rhoades’ individual defined benefit plan. The matter presently before the Court is plaintiff Rhoades, McKee, Boer, Goodrich and- Titta’s motion to recover reasonable litigation costs. This motion is timely pursuant to Local Rule 10(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B).
26 U.S.C. § 7430 allows the prevailing party in a tax refund action against the United States…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Estate of Frank Martin Perry, Sr., Deceased, Michael C. Perry, Whit S. Perry, and Robert S. Perry, Co-Executors v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Stieha v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
- Vinson & Elkins, J. Evans Attwell, Tax Matters Partner v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Citrus Valley Estates v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rhoades, McKee, & Boer v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1994