Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. Qualex, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 1991No. 9026SC1104PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge./

The question presented by this appeal is whether failure to maintain minimum point standards required by the employer’s no-fault attendance policy constitutes substantial fault on the employee’s part connected with her work not rising to the level of misconduct. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 96-14(2A) (1990). Claimant’s conduct does rise to the level of substantial fault. The superior court’s judgment upholding the decision of the Employment Security Commission of North Carolina to disqualify claimant from receiving unemployment benefits for a period of nine weeks, pursuant to G.S. §…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Baptist Children's Homes of North Carolina, Inc. v. Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Doyle v. Southeastern Glass Laminates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Applewhite v. Alliance One International, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Applewhite v. Alliance One International, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Doyle v. Southeastern Glass Laminates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. HAYWOOD COUNCIL ON AGING v. MathisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API