Legal Opinion

State v. . Hedgecock

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 1923PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCiARK, C. J.

The indictment in tbis case is as follows: “the jurors for the State, upon their oatb preseüt tbat B. H. Hedgecock (being cashier of the Home Banking Company), late of the county of Guilford, on 22 April, in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and twenty-two, witb force and arms, at and in the county aforesaid, did unlawfully, willfully, and feloniously make a false entry on the books of the Home Banking Company by charging the account of M. J. Wrenn witb $10,000 on the savings ledger, thereby reducing bis balance from $24,242.50 to $14,242.50, witb the intent to unlawfully,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. . DowdySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. State v. HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  3. State v. . MuseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1838
  4. State v. . BurkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  5. State v. . FaucettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1838

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. . ColeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. State v. . JarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. State v. . SwitzerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. State v. . LattimoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API