Legal Opinion
David Allen Benson v. Todd Spitzer
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 6, 2025No. 8:25-cv-02179Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SOUTHERN DIVISION 11 12 DAVID ALLEN BENSON, No. 8:25-cv-2179-MRA-BFM 13 Petitioner, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 14 WHY HABEAS PETITION TODD SPITZER, SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 This Order concerns a federal habeas petition. Petitioner David Allen 19 Benson invokes 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF 1 (“Petition”).) Under Rule 4 of the Rules 20 Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Court—rules that 21 apply to the Petition in this Court—the Court must review the Petition before 22 ordering…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States Ex Rel. Robinson Rancheria Citizens Council v. Borneo, Inc. Clear Lake Indian Bingo Ltd. American Arbitration Association Herman SchnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Erick Arevalo v. Vicki HennessyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- People v. AbilezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Guadalupe Beltran v. State of California, and United Farm Workers of America, Afl-Cio, an Unincorporated AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.