Legal Opinion

Ace Contracting Co. v. Garfield & Arma Associates

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Norman C. Ryp, J.

a. ISSUE

Whether a (fabricated stainless steel) sub-subcontractor can enforce a mechanic’s lien under Lien Law article 3 after subcontractor and general contractor (to erect a McDonald’s storefront) have both been fully paid. An issue of budding and building first impression.

This is a Lien Law §59 special proceeding in which petitioner, Ace Contracting Company, seeks to vacate the mechanic’s lien filed on the premises known as 1499 Third Avenue (Block 1530, Lot 48), New York, New York by respondent, *476Milgo Industrial, Inc. For the hereinbelow stated reasons,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Szemko v. WeinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  2. Dempsey v. Mount Sinai HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  3. Dempsey v. . Mount Sinai HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. E. F. Curialle & Co. v. Kenray Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peri Formwork Systems, Inc. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Clifford Broman & Son, Inc. v. Town of BabylonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API