Legal Opinion
Bumpass v. Verizon Wireless
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided September 27, 2019No. 5:16-cv-00106Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION ANITA BUMPASS PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 5:16-cv-00106-KGB VERIZON WIRELESS DEFENDANT OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is defendant Verizon Wireless’ (“Verizon”) motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 34). Verizon moves for summary judgment on each of Ms. Bumpass’ claims (Dkt. No. 34). Pending is a motion filed by Ms. Bumpass requesting additional time to respond (Dkt. No. 42). The Court grants that motion and considers Ms. Bumpass’ response timely filed (Dkt. No. 42). Ms. Bumpass responded in opposition to…
2Cases cited91 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.