Legal Opinion

American Freedom Defense Initiative v. Lynch

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 9, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2016-1437PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

James E. Boasberg, United States District Judge

Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter may be host to a melange of cat videos, musings from long-lost cousins, and odes to Bey-oncé, but not all content is welcome on these social-media platforms. Pursuant to their private terms of service, the companies have repeatedly taken down some of Plaintiffs’ posts criticizing Islam. Plaintiffs—two non-profit organizations and them leaders—allege that such action constitutes censorship and discrimination on the basis of content, viewpoint, and religion. Yet a quick glance at this case’s caption…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holmok v. BurkeOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. Brikman v. Twitter, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2020
  3. Fyk v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
  4. Murphy v. Twitter, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. NetChoice LLC v. ReyesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API