American Freedom Defense Initiative v. Lynch
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
James E. Boasberg, United States District Judge
Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter may be host to a melange of cat videos, musings from long-lost cousins, and odes to Bey-oncé, but not all content is welcome on these social-media platforms. Pursuant to their private terms of service, the companies have repeatedly taken down some of Plaintiffs’ posts criticizing Islam. Plaintiffs—two non-profit organizations and them leaders—allege that such action constitutes censorship and discrimination on the basis of content, viewpoint, and religion. Yet a quick glance at this case’s caption…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Holmok v. BurkeOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Brikman v. Twitter, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- Fyk v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Murphy v. Twitter, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- NetChoice LLC v. ReyesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024