Simonsen v. Sandy River Auto, LLC
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeVORE, P.J.
*81Defendant's appeal contrasts a jury's verdict that found no damages with a trial court's decision that granted rescission in plaintiff's claim for violation of the Unlawful Trade Practices Act (UTPA), ORS 646.605 - 646.656. Plaintiff Simonsen brought a claim against defendant Sandy River Auto, LLC, arising out of defendant's sale of a vehicle to plaintiff. Plaintiff sought rescission or, in the alternative, damages. The jury found that defendant willfully failed to disclose material defects in the vehicle but awarded plaintiff no damages. The trial court found that plaintiff suffered…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Pearson v. Philip Morris, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. Chase Gardens, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Scott v. Western International Surplus Sales, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clark v. Eddie Bauer LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2023
- Susan Clark v. Eddie Bauer LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Al Poller and Deb Poller v. Okoboji Classic Cars, LLCSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021
- Al Poller and Deb Poller v. Okoboji Classic Cars, LLCSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021
- Bradshaw Renovations, LLC v. Barry Graham and Jacklynn GrahamCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.