Legal Opinion
Arunachalam v. International Business MacHines Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 28, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2020-2362Published
1Opinion of the Court
FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1/28/2021 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-02362 (UNA) ) INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS ) MACHINES CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this patent infringement matter on August 24, 2020. Upon initial review of the Complaint, the court found that Plaintiff failed to establish venue pursuant to the relevant statute, 28 U.S.C. §1400(b), and issued an order requiring…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Tony Best v. Sharon Pratt Kelly, MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Michael Sindram v. John H. Suda Paul R. Webber, III Oliver P. Corbin Edward Jenkins Everett O'Quinn Frederick B. Beane, Jr. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.