Hanscom v. Meyer
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court of Douglas county. Heard below before Keysor, J. References as to inverse-order rule: Ireland v. Woolman, 15 Mich. 258; Lausman v. Drahos, 8 Neb. 457; Iglehart v. Crane, 42 111. 261; Loch v. Fulford, 52 111. 166; State v. Titus, 17 Wis. 248; Aihin v. Milwaukee & S. P. R. Co., 37 Wis. 469; Ex parte Merriam, 4 Den. [N. Y.] 254; Andreas v. Hubbard, 50 Conn. 357. References as to error in excluding évidence: Higgles r.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the district court of Douglas county. Heard below before Keysor, J. References as to inverse-order rule: Ireland v. Woolman, 15 Mich. 258; Lausman v. Drahos, 8 Neb. 457; Iglehart v. Crane, 42 111. 261; Loch v. Fulford, 52 111. 166; State v. Titus, 17 Wis. 248; Aihin v. Milwaukee & S. P. R. Co., 37 Wis. 469; Ex parte Merriam, 4 Den. [N. Y.] 254; Andreas v. Hubbard, 50 Conn. 357. References as to error in excluding évidence: Higgles r. Erney, 154 U. S. 254; Harman v. Harman, 70 Fed. Rep. 894; Ferguson v. Hafferty, 128 Pa. 337; German-American Ins. Go. v. Hart, 43 Neb. 441; Woodworth…
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, C. J.
On May 15, 1886, the appellants herein purchased of, and there was conveyed to them by, Andrew J. Hanscom, the appellee, eighty acres of land near the city of Omaha, probably about three and one-half miles distant from the then center of the city. A more particular description of the land is as follows: The southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of section 31, and the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of section 32, in township 15 north, of range 13 east of the sixth principal meridian. The agreed consideration to be paid for the property was $40,-000, of which there was a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Durm v. FishMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Lausman v. DrahosNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bradfield v. SewallNebraska Supreme Court · 1899