Legal Opinion

Crest Auto Supplies, Inc. v. Ero Manufacturing Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 25, 1965No. 62 C 2082PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAROVITZ, District Judge.

Motion of defendants for summary-judgment and/or to dismiss.

Motion of defendants for summary judgment on its counterclaims.

This is a six count civil anti-trust action brought by three “exclusive franchisees” against their supplier, a manufacturer of automobile seat covers and related accessories. It is alleged that beginning in 1958, and ending in 1961, the defendant entered into a series of franchise agreements with dealers around the country, including the instant plaintiffs, -under the terms of which, said franchisees were licensed to use the trade name “Protecto,”…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Great Lakes Rubber Corporation v. Herbert Cooper Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kuehne & Nagel (AG & Co.) v. Geosource, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  2. Boynton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. Wong v. BaconDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1977
  4. PilePro, LLC v. ChangDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2016
  5. Adams v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API