Jenkins v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
1Opinion of the Court
DISSENTING OPINION
BILL VANCE, Justice.
Jenkins’s third issue complains of the court’s denial of his motion to dismiss for failure to provide a speedy trial, in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. See Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 515, 530, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 2192, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972). 1 With little analysis, the majority overrules the issue. Believing that a correct analysis of the Barker factors yields a different result, I respectfully dissent.
The right to a speedy trial was designed: (1) to prevent oppressive pretrial incarceration; (2) to minimize anxiety and concern of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Zamorano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.