Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided December 11, 2007No. 10-06-00132-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

DISSENTING OPINION

BILL VANCE, Justice.

Jenkins’s third issue complains of the court’s denial of his motion to dismiss for failure to provide a speedy trial, in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. See Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 515, 530, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 2192, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972). 1 With little analysis, the majority overrules the issue. Believing that a correct analysis of the Barker factors yields a different result, I respectfully dissent.

The right to a speedy trial was designed: (1) to prevent oppressive pretrial incarceration; (2) to minimize anxiety and concern of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Zamorano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API