Legal Opinion

Stoltz v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 1991No. WD 44206PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Robert W. Stoltz was arrested for the violation of Kansas City, Missouri Ordinance § 34.116(b), which makes it unlawful, “for any person who is under the influence of intoxicating liquor to be in a position to physically handle the driving mechanism of any vehicle within the city.” His license to drive was suspended pursuant to Missouri’s Suspension and Revocation, Administrative Procedure Law §§ 302.500-302.-540, RSMo 1986. After a trial de novo, the circuit court ordered his license reinstated. The Director of Revenue appeals the reinstatement. The judgment is reversed.

The facts, in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. United States v. Augustin Alonso LopezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  4. City of Kansas City v. TroutnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Miller v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cox v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Wilcox v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Chinnery v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Gleason v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Hines v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API