State v. Conrad
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Crothers, Justice.
[¶ 1] The State appeals from a pretrial order dismissing criminal charges of theft of property and exploitation of a vulnerable adult against Caroline Conrad based on the civil dispute doctrine. We reverse and remand for further proceedings because the civil dispute doctrine does not apply in this case.
I
[¶ 2] In December 2015 the State charged Conrad with theft of property under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-23-02(1) and exploitation of a vulnerable adult under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-07.1(l)(b), alleging Conrad used for herself more than $50,000 in funds her elderly mother deposited in a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. TrosenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. KaufmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re Estate of PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Estates of Vizenor and Vizenor v. MeslingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HoukomNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. GrattonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020