Legal Opinion

State v. Conrad

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 2017No. 20160301PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crothers, Justice.

[¶ 1] The State appeals from a pretrial order dismissing criminal charges of theft of property and exploitation of a vulnerable adult against Caroline Conrad based on the civil dispute doctrine. We reverse and remand for further proceedings because the civil dispute doctrine does not apply in this case.

I

[¶ 2] In December 2015 the State charged Conrad with theft of property under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-23-02(1) and exploitation of a vulnerable adult under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-07.1(l)(b), alleging Conrad used for herself more than $50,000 in funds her elderly mother deposited in a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. TrosenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. KaufmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. In Re Estate of PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Estates of Vizenor and Vizenor v. MeslingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HoukomNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. GrattonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API