Legal Opinion
Singer Manuf'g Co. v. Springfield Foundry Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
Decided April 2, 1888PublishedCited by 12 opinions
In Equity. Action for infringement of patent.
1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.
This suit is brought for the infringement of tbe sixth claim of letters patent No. 208,838, dated October 8, 1878, all the claims of letters patent No. 229,629, dated July 6, 1880, and the second claim of letters patent No. 274,359, dated March 20, 1883. Those several patents were issued to the complainant for improvements in sewing-machines. The bill has been taken pro confesso as against the Springfield Foundry Company. The present controversy is between the complainant and the remaining defendant, Duckworth. Duckworth is a machín*394ist, and has made a specialty of repairing sewing-machines.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Oliver v. PiattSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Wilson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Chaffee v. Boston Belting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Aiken v. Manchester Print WorksUnited States Circuit Court · 1865
3Cited by12 opinions
- Goodyear Shoe Machinery Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1901
- Shickle, Harrison & Howard Iron Co. v. St. Louis Car-Coupler Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Connecticut Telephone & Electric Co. v. Automotive Equipment Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1926
- National Malleable Casting Co. v. American Steel FoundriesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1910
- Wilkins Shoe-Button Fastener Co. v. WebbU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1898
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.