Legal Opinion

Tyler v. MacKs Stores of South Carolina, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 1, 1980No. 21337PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Chief Justice:

The complaint in this matter alleges three causes of action, two of which were against the appellant and are the subject of this appeal. The trial judge relied on Springfield v. Williams Plumbing Supply Company, 249 S. C. 130, 153 S. E. (2d) 184, denied the appellant’s demurrer to the cause of action against it, and allowed the case to go to trial without, prejudice. We affirm.

The sole ground of appeal is that the demurrer should have been sustained because the facts stated do not support. publication or disclosure, necessary elements of an action for defamation in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Springfield v. Williams Plumbing Supply Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  2. Timmons v. THE NEWS & PRESS, INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  3. Williams v. StrebSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  4. Montgomery v. Service Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Murray, v. Holnam, Inc. and Thomas Thornton, of Whom Holnam, Inc. IsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Abofreka v. Alston Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Maxine B. Cooper v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Incorporated, and Esab Group, Incorporated Roche Biomedical Laboratories, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  4. Garner v. Morrison Knudsen Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  5. Fountain v. First Reliance BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API