Purcell v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
A federal district court, composed of three judges in accordance with 28 U. S. C. § 47, dismissed the appellants’ bill, which prayed for the annulment of an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission. 41 E. Supp. 309.' The order permitted the Confluence and Oakland Railroad Company, as owner, and the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, as lessee, to abandon a railroad line approximately 20 miles long and to discontinue service entirely in the area now served: a semi-mountainous section along the Youghiogheny River between Confluence and Oakland Junction, Pennsylvania, and Kendall, Maryland.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Colorado v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
3Cited by42 opinions
- Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- McLean Trucking Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- City of Yonkers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.