Legal Opinion

Oko v. Rogers

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 18, 1984No. 3-83-0479PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

This appeal arises out of a medical malpractice action brought by the plaintiff, June Oko, against the defendant, Dr. James Rogers, who appeared pro se. The complaint alleged that the defendant was negligent in performing hemorrhoid surgery on the plaintiff. A jury verdict was returned in favor of the defendant.

The issues on appeal concern whether the plaintiff was denied her right to a fair trial due to the conduct of the defendant acting as his own counsel. An issue is also raised as to the jury instructions. Relevant facts will be presented as needed.

The plaintiff first argues that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stogsdill v. Manor Convalescent Home, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. Schireson v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Terracina v. CastelliAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Tripp v. Bureau Service Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. Clamage v. ShapiroAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Irvin v. City of ClarksvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  2. Jistarri v. NappiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Laird v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Madison Associates v. BassAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Richter v. Northwestern Memorial HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API