Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1951No. 47969PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWennbrstrum, J.

Plaintiff, in a law action, sought recovery for personal injuries and damages to his automobile by reason of a collision between the vehicle owned and then operated by him and a railroad freight car being propelled across a street in Waterloo by an engine of defendant-company. The case was tried to the court as there had been no demand for a jury. Rules 177, 178, R. C. P. Subsequent to the close of all the testimony and the overruling of defendant’s motion for judgment, the trial court filed its written findings of fact and conclusions of law and therein held the defendant guilty of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Carlson v. MeusbergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Montanick Ex Rel. Montanick v. McMillinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  3. Lawson v. FordyceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  4. Fitter v. Iowa Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Walmer-Roberts v. HennesseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Strom v. Des Moines & Central Iowa Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  2. Jacobson v. AldrichSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  3. Joseph Kennedy v. R. C. Bennett, D/B/A Bennett Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
  4. Peterschmidt v. MenkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  5. Rosin v. Northwestern States Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API