Tankersley v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Shulman, Judge.
Appellant-Larry Tankersley and Jerry Bennett (not a party to this appeal) were jointly indicted and tried for a number of offenses allegedly arising from their nocturnal visit to the premises of an automobile dealership. From his conviction on all counts, Tankersley brings this appeal. We affirm.
1. Appellant enumerates as error the denial of his motion for discovery. The record shows, however, that appellant’s motion was not denied. The trial court entered an order requiring disclosure of all reports of tests or examinations and requiring the submission of the prosecutor’s file…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dingler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Harrell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Creamer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Daniel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- E.J. Wilson, Dearest Davis, and Cassandra Linder, Plaintiffs v. Roland AttawayCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Anthony Wayne Hardigree v. Marc LoftonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.