Cornell v. Redrow
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On bill, answer and proofs.
1Opinion of the Court
Grey, V. C.
(orally).
The questions in dispute are, I think, sufficiently easy of solution to be determined at once. The bill alleges the existence of a partnership between the complainant and the defendant; that the complainant was by the defendant unjustly forced out of his rights in the enjoyment of the partnership, and the ascertainment of the profits which were to come to him as a *252partner, and prays that the partnership may be declared void— I presume that means that it may be dissolved — that an accounting may be had, and a receiver appointed; with a further prayer that the defendant may…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Fenwick v. U.C.C. of N.J.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
- Irving Brodsky v. The Perth Amboy National Bank, a Banking Corporation Organized Under the Laws of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Fayter v. Shore, Et Vir.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
- La Familia Cosmovision, Inc. v. the Inspiration NetworksNorth Carolina Business Court · 2014
- Yonadi v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.