Legal Opinion

Litwin v. Allen

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGeehan, J.

This application presents an unusual situation. The defendant seeks to examine two witnesses whose testimony it is alleged can prove that the plaintiff was neither the owner of record nor the equitable owner of stock at the commencement of the action, and therefore under the law has not the legal capacity to sue. While the law is well settled that a stockholder need not be the owner of record to institute the action, he must at least be the equitable owner. The plaintiff alleges she is the owner of said stocks. The defendant states that the plaintiff is not the owner either of record or…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Craftsman Finance & Mortgage Co. v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1945
  2. Croen v. GottliebNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Gittleman v. DoyleNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Law v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API