Legal Opinion

Croen v. Gottlieb

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1957PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeobge M. Fanelli, J.

This is a motion by the individual defendants, Max and Robert Fleischer, August J. Bartko and the corporate defendants for the following relief: (1) to dismiss the complaint pursuant to subdivision 2 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice as to plaintiffs, Maurice and Jack Schrier, upon the ground that pursuant to section 61 of the General Corporation Law said plaintiffs have no legal capacity to sue; (2) to dismiss that portion of the complaint which alleges corporate waste and injury to corporate property pursuant to subdivision 5 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, upon the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gottfried v. GottfriedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  2. Myer v. MyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Willcox v. Harriman Securities CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1933
  4. Coane v. American Distilling Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Miller v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matthies v. Seymour Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1958
  2. Marco v. DullesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  3. Sorin v. Shahmoon Industries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Ruzzo v. Kingston Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API