Parrish v. Cole
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
Defendant contends that the amendment to the order was improper because the trial court lacked jurisdiction. The issue presented is whether a notice of appeal bars a subsequent but timely motion to amend the findings of fact pursuant to Rule 52(b) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 52(b) states that “[u]pon motion of a party made not later than 10 days after entry of judgment the court may amend its findings or make additional findings and may amend the judgment accordingly. The motion may be made with a motion for a new trial pursuant to Rule 59.” Although the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Elgen Manufacturing Corporation v. Ventfabrics, Inc., Elgen Manufacturing Corporation v. Ventfabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Wiggins v. BunchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- American Floor MacHine Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Fiske v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lewis v. BlackburnDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1983
- McClure v. County of JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Branch Branking & Trust Co. v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Eastern North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- York v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- County of Durham v. DayeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.