Legal Opinion

Mason v. Marriage & Family Center

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 1991No. D011128PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENKE, J.

Introduction

Appellant Joyce M[ason appeals from a summary judgment. She argues a triable issue of fact exists as to when respondent’s alleged malpractice caused her injury. We agree and reverse.

Factual and Procedural Background

In September 1977, Mason became a patient of respondents Dr. Charles E. Hansen and Susan Hansen. Charles Hansen is a licensed clinical psychologist. His wife Susan Hansen is a licensed marriage, family and child counselor. Together the Hansens practiced as the Marriage and Family Center.

Mason claims that in 1983, during her therapist/patient relationship…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Jerrie M. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Price v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Prilliman v. United Air Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Consumer Cause, Inc. v. SmilecareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Scalf v. D. B. Log Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Kirby v. Albert D. Seeno Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API