Mason v. Marriage & Family Center
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, J.
Introduction
Appellant Joyce M[ason appeals from a summary judgment. She argues a triable issue of fact exists as to when respondent’s alleged malpractice caused her injury. We agree and reverse.
Factual and Procedural Background
In September 1977, Mason became a patient of respondents Dr. Charles E. Hansen and Susan Hansen. Charles Hansen is a licensed clinical psychologist. His wife Susan Hansen is a licensed marriage, family and child counselor. Together the Hansens practiced as the Marriage and Family Center.
Mason claims that in 1983, during her therapist/patient relationship…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Jerrie M. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Price v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Prilliman v. United Air Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Consumer Cause, Inc. v. SmilecareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Scalf v. D. B. Log Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Kirby v. Albert D. Seeno Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.