Legal Opinion

Doe Run Resources Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 2013No. ED 98086PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The underlying lawsuit was brought by Respondent/Cross-Appellant The Doe Run Resources Corporation (Doe Run) seeking coverage for environmental remediation costs under seven excess insurance policies issued by Appellant/Cross-Respondent Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London etal. (LMI).

At the crux of this case is a choice of law issue — whether Missouri or New York law applies. Doe Run argued that Missouri law governed the policies providing coverage from 1952 to 1961. The trial court ruled in favor of LMI finding New York law applied. In a July 14, 2011 written order and also during…

3Cases cited29 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Western Blue Print Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  3. Tune v. Synergy Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  4. Wood v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Crown Center Redevelopment Corp. v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by23 opinions

  1. Scott v. KingMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Jacobson Warehouse Co., Inc. v. Schnuck Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  3. Drury Co. v. Missouri United School Insurance CounselMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Baldridge v. Kan. City Pub. Sch.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Travelers Commercial Casualty Company v. Vac-It-All Services, Inc., Respondent/Cross-Appellant.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API