Doe Run Resources Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The underlying lawsuit was brought by Respondent/Cross-Appellant The Doe Run Resources Corporation (Doe Run) seeking coverage for environmental remediation costs under seven excess insurance policies issued by Appellant/Cross-Respondent Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London etal. (LMI).
At the crux of this case is a choice of law issue — whether Missouri or New York law applies. Doe Run argued that Missouri law governed the policies providing coverage from 1952 to 1961. The trial court ruled in favor of LMI finding New York law applied. In a July 14, 2011 written order and also during…
3Cases cited29 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Western Blue Print Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Tune v. Synergy Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Wood v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Crown Center Redevelopment Corp. v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by23 opinions
- Scott v. KingMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Jacobson Warehouse Co., Inc. v. Schnuck Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Drury Co. v. Missouri United School Insurance CounselMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Baldridge v. Kan. City Pub. Sch.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Travelers Commercial Casualty Company v. Vac-It-All Services, Inc., Respondent/Cross-Appellant.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.