Payne v. Dicus
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Henry District Court. — Hon. E. L. Burton, Judge. Action upon certain promissory notes aided by an attachment, in which one Griffith intervened. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. From a judgment for the plaintiff, the intervenor appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.
The plaintiff on June 30, 1889, filed a petition in the district court of Henry county, Iowa, against the defendant, claiming judgment therein on two notes, one for six hundred dollars, and the other for two hundred and fifty dollars; both being then due and payable to the plaintiff. The two hundred and fifty dollar note was, by its express terms, made payable at the residence of the plaintiff, which was in Henry county. No place of payment was stated in the six hundred dollar note, but it is shown that, some time after its execution, the defendant verbally agreed with the plaintiff to pay it…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Orcutt v. HansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Gable v. HainerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Haller v. ParrottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- F. W. Rosenthal & Co. v. BilgerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Wasson v. MillsapSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
3Cited by8 opinions
- Langhammer v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- State v. RoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Dougherty v. City of SiouxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- McDonald v. Second National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Murphy v. McCarthySupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.