Legal Opinion

Ross v. Ross

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 2011No. COA11-141PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

This is plaintiff’s third appeal to this Court arising from the domestic litigation between him and defendant. See Ross v. Ross, 193 N.C. App. 247, 666 S.E.2d 889, 2008 N.C. App. LEXIS 1801 (N.C. App. October 7, 2008) (unpublished) (affirmed in part; vacated and remanded in part), disc. review denied, 363 N.C. 656, 685 S.E.2d 106 (2009); and Ross v. Ross (now Osborne), 194 N.C. App. 365, 669 S.E.2d 828 (2008) (appeal dismissed; filed 16 December 2008). After our prior opinion of 7 October 2008, only one issue remained for consideration on remand: “an appropriate reclassification…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. In Re HatleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. In Re Pedestrian Walkway FailureCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. American Imports, Inc. v. G. E. Employees Western Region Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Goss v. BattleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ross v. RossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. Dunhill HoldingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  3. Dunhill HoldingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  4. Dunhill Holdings v. Tisha LindbergCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API